aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang-tools-extra
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Toth <jonas.toth@gmail.com>2019-01-10 11:56:44 +0000
committerJonas Toth <jonas.toth@gmail.com>2019-01-10 11:56:44 +0000
commit6a9f831ffd9fc7f5a6ad7dafa0795183ecd92dec (patch)
treea70bdbf4020df8e4462462c5ee0164e814515e7b /clang-tools-extra
parent8a7c2ab9905cde778bef1d152402af44f2fac4e9 (diff)
[clang-tidy] Fix case of local variables in modernize-use-nodiscard checker
Summary: Correct the case of the local variables.. Rational: I want to be able to run clang-tidy on new clang-tidy checker code prior to creating a review (to demonstrate we should dog food our own tools during development, not my suggestion but @Eugene.Zelenko) To this end I am running the following in a script, prior to make a change. ``` tidy: @for source in $$(git status -suno | grep ".cpp$$" | cut -c4-) ;\ do \ clang-tidy -quiet $$source -- $(TIDY_FLAGS);\ done ``` I then want to go through the checkers and see which checkers most closely match the review style of the reviewers ``` --- Checks: ' -clang-diagnostic-*, readability-identifier-naming, llvm-header-guard ' WarningsAsErrors: '' HeaderFilterRegex: '' AnalyzeTemporaryDtors: false FormatStyle: LLVM CheckOptions: - key: readability-identifier-naming.IgnoreFailedSplit value: '0' - key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase value: 'CamelCase' - key: readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase value: 'CamelCase' ... ``` Unfortunately in doing so, I have identified that my previous review {D55433} it violates what looks like to be the convention of local variables being in CamelCase. Sending this small review in the hope it can be corrected. Patch by MyDeveloperDay. Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko Reviewed By: JonasToth Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56536 llvm-svn: 350814
Diffstat (limited to 'clang-tools-extra')
-rw-r--r--clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseNodiscardCheck.cpp12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseNodiscardCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseNodiscardCheck.cpp
index 69e1734075ce..f655515bb991 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseNodiscardCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseNodiscardCheck.cpp
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void UseNodiscardCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
return;
- auto functionObj =
+ auto FunctionObj =
cxxRecordDecl(hasAnyName("::std::function", "::boost::function"));
// Find all non-void const methods which have not already been marked to
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ void UseNodiscardCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
hasAttr(clang::attr::WarnUnusedResult),
hasType(isInstantiationDependentType()),
hasAnyParameter(anyOf(
- parmVarDecl(anyOf(hasType(functionObj),
- hasType(references(functionObj)))),
+ parmVarDecl(anyOf(hasType(FunctionObj),
+ hasType(references(FunctionObj)))),
hasType(isNonConstReferenceOrPointer()),
hasParameterPack()))))))
.bind("no_discard"),
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ void UseNodiscardCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
if (Loc.isInvalid() || Loc.isMacroID())
return;
- SourceLocation retLoc = MatchedDecl->getInnerLocStart();
+ SourceLocation RetLoc = MatchedDecl->getInnerLocStart();
ASTContext &Context = *Result.Context;
- auto Diag = diag(retLoc, "function %0 should be marked " + NoDiscardMacro)
+ auto Diag = diag(RetLoc, "function %0 should be marked " + NoDiscardMacro)
<< MatchedDecl;
// Check for the existence of the keyword being used as the ``[[nodiscard]]``.
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void UseNodiscardCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
// 1. A const member function which returns a variable which is ignored
// but performs some external I/O operation and the return value could be
// ignored.
- Diag << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(retLoc, NoDiscardMacro + " ");
+ Diag << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(RetLoc, NoDiscardMacro + " ");
}
} // namespace modernize