summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2022-05-26 09:43:14 -0400
committerPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2022-07-21 10:26:13 -0400
commit12d8a4a0fb26729290a184c40956329bb614625f (patch)
treeed49d3271d075cad4f7437d0ce2e604ae2cde979 /gcc/testsuite
parent4f15d2234608e82159d030dadb17af678cfad626 (diff)
c++: constrained partial spec forward decl [PR96363]
Here during cp_parser_single_declaration for #2, we were calling associate_classtype_constraints for TPL<T> (the primary template type) before maybe_process_partial_specialization could get a chance to notice that we're in fact declaring a distinct constrained partial spec and not redeclaring the primary template. This caused us to emit a bogus error about differing constraints b/t the primary template and #2's constraints. This patch fixes this by moving the call to associate_classtype_constraints after the call to shadow_tag (which calls maybe_process_partial_specialization) and adjusting shadow_tag to use the return value of m_p_p_s. Moreover, if we later try to define a constrained partial specialization that's been declared earlier (as in the third testcase), then maybe_new_partial_specialization correctly notices it's a redeclaration and returns NULL_TREE. But in this case we also need to update TYPE to point to the redeclared partial spec (it'll otherwise continue pointing to the primary template type, eventually leading to a bogus error). PR c++/96363 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * decl.cc (shadow_tag): Use the return value of maybe_process_partial_specialization. * parser.cc (cp_parser_single_declaration): Call shadow_tag before associate_classtype_constraints. * pt.cc (maybe_new_partial_specialization): Change return type to bool. Take 'type' argument by mutable reference. Set 'type' to point to the correct constrained specialization when appropriate. (maybe_process_partial_specialization): Adjust accordingly. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C: New test. (cherry picked from commit 97dc78d705a90c1ae83c78a7f2e24942cc3a6257)
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C10
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C14
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C16
3 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9bb6e2d9ea6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/96363
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T> class TPL;
+
+template<class T> requires true class TPL<T>; // #1
+template<class T> requires false class TPL<T>; // #2 error here
+
+template<class T> requires true class TPL<T*>; // #1
+template<class T> requires false class TPL<T*>; // #2 error here
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6d23a28892d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/96363
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+// A version of concepts-partial-spec12.C where the primary template is
+// constrained.
+
+template<class T> concept C = true;
+
+template<C T> class TPL;
+
+template<C T> requires true class TPL<T>; // #1
+template<C T> requires false class TPL<T>; // #2 error here
+
+template<C T> requires true class TPL<T*>; // #1
+template<C T> requires false class TPL<T*>; // #2 error here
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b5ec2c92585
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/99501
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<auto> struct X;
+
+template<auto V> requires requires{V.a;} struct X<V>;
+template<auto V> requires requires{V.b;} struct X<V>;
+
+template<auto V> requires requires{V.a;} struct X<V> { static const bool v = false; };
+template<auto V> requires requires{V.b;} struct X<V> { static const bool v = true; };
+
+struct A { int a; };
+static_assert(!X<A{}>::v);
+
+struct B { int b; };
+static_assert(X<B{}>::v);