summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>2023-11-17 21:45:06 +0000
committerPedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>2023-12-20 21:19:14 +0000
commit45fd40cf54292caad19baef666e6b3318350a9fe (patch)
tree8a6afdba6a2f7f9db5657ce960d5be29c02fb115 /gdb
parent249d08128787e4e0a977079aa09516d73f196f77 (diff)
Step over thread exit, always delete the thread non-silently
With AMD GPU debugging, I noticed that when stepping over a breakpoint placed on top of the s_endpgm instruction inline (displaced=off), GDB would behave differently -- it wouldn't print the wave exit. E.g: With displaced stepping, or no breakpoint at all: stepi [AMDGPU Wave 1:4:1:1 (0,0,0)/0 exited] Command aborted, thread exited. (gdb) With inline stepping: stepi Command aborted, thread exited. (gdb) In the cases we see the "exited" notification, handle_thread_exit is what first called delete_thread on the exiting thread, which is non-silent. With inline stepping, however, handle_thread_exit ends up in update_thread_list (via restart_threads) before any delete_thread call. Thus, amd_dbgapi_target::update_thread_list notices that the wave is gone and deletes it with delete_thread_silent. This commit fixes it, by making handle_thread_exited call set_thread_exited (with the default silent=false) early, which emits the user-visible notification. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: I22ab3145e18d07c99dace45576307b9f9d5d966f
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
-rw-r--r--gdb/infrun.c11
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 76693a30611..1d863896c40 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -5885,6 +5885,13 @@ handle_thread_exited (execution_control_state *ecs)
update the thread list and delete the event thread. */
bool abort_cmd = (ecs->event_thread->thread_fsm () != nullptr);
+ /* Mark the thread exited right now, because finish_step_over may
+ update the thread list and that may delete the thread silently
+ (depending on target), while we always want to emit the "[Thread
+ ... exited]" notification. Don't actually delete the thread yet,
+ because we need to pass its pointer down to finish_step_over. */
+ set_thread_exited (ecs->event_thread);
+
/* Maybe the thread was doing a step-over, if so release
resources and start any further pending step-overs.
@@ -5904,10 +5911,6 @@ handle_thread_exited (execution_control_state *ecs)
event thread again, as finish_step_over may have switched
threads. */
switch_to_thread (ecs->event_thread);
-
- /* Emit [Thread ... exited] notification. */
- delete_thread (ecs->event_thread);
-
ecs->event_thread = nullptr;
return false;
}