From 8b1a17c7c5c528f9f512ad2b1098feedcee289da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Randy Dunlap Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:36:49 -0700 Subject: Documentation: locking: ww-mutex-design: drop duplicated word Drop the doubled word "up". Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200703213649.30948-3-rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation/locking') diff --git a/Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst b/Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst index 1846c199da23..54d9c17bb66b 100644 --- a/Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst +++ b/Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ However, the Wound-Wait algorithm is typically stated to generate fewer backoffs compared to Wait-Die, but is, on the other hand, associated with more work than Wait-Die when recovering from a backoff. Wound-Wait is also a preemptive algorithm in that transactions are wounded by other transactions, and that -requires a reliable way to pick up up the wounded condition and preempt the +requires a reliable way to pick up the wounded condition and preempt the running transaction. Note that this is not the same as process preemption. A Wound-Wait transaction is considered preempted when it dies (returning -EDEADLK) following a wound. -- cgit v1.2.3