From 0ff3bab530c35dd6499f7f2d639816df2e1241cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:03:31 -0400 Subject: SUNRPC: define {create,destroy}_use_gss_proxy_proc_entry in !PROC case Though I wonder whether we should really just depend on CONFIG_PROC_FS at some point. Reported-by: kbuild test robot --- net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/sunrpc') diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c index 1c66a3b78329..b70ac1cec8f5 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c @@ -1283,6 +1283,8 @@ static bool use_gss_proxy(struct net *net) return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS + static bool set_gss_proxy(struct net *net, int type) { struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id); @@ -1320,7 +1322,6 @@ static int wait_for_gss_proxy(struct net *net) return wait_event_interruptible(sn->gssp_wq, gssp_ready(sn)); } -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS static ssize_t write_gssp(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) @@ -1406,6 +1407,14 @@ static void destroy_use_gss_proxy_proc_entry(struct net *net) clear_gssp_clnt(sn); } } +#else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ + +static int create_use_gss_proxy_proc_entry(struct net *net) +{ + return 0; +} + +static void destroy_use_gss_proxy_proc_entry(struct net *net) {} #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ -- cgit v1.2.3