summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>2012-01-27 14:12:32 -0300
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>2012-05-28 19:10:57 -0300
commita7d7d2e1a07e3811dc49af2962c940fd8bbb6c8f (patch)
tree6c3ac39bf25fb7810668f57476c7b5872d5b418b /drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
parent76e10d158efb6d4516018846f60c2ab5501900bc (diff)
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it
The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/edac/edac_mc.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/edac/edac_mc.c47
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index feef7733fae7..c1aae7233022 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan)
debugf4("\tchannel = %p\n", chan);
debugf4("\tchannel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx);
debugf4("\tchannel->ce_count = %d\n", chan->ce_count);
- debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->label);
+ debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->dimm->label);
debugf4("\tchannel->csrow = %p\n\n", chan->csrow);
}
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct csrow_info *csi, *csrow;
struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan;
+ struct dimm_info *dimm;
void *pvt;
unsigned size;
int row, chn;
@@ -170,7 +171,8 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
mci = (struct mem_ctl_info *)0;
csi = edac_align_ptr(&mci[1], sizeof(*csi));
chi = edac_align_ptr(&csi[nr_csrows], sizeof(*chi));
- pvt = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt);
+ dimm = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sizeof(*dimm));
+ pvt = edac_align_ptr(&dimm[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt);
size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -182,14 +184,22 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
*/
csi = (struct csrow_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)csi));
chi = (struct rank_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)chi));
+ dimm = (struct dimm_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)dimm));
pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
/* setup index and various internal pointers */
mci->mc_idx = edac_index;
mci->csrows = csi;
+ mci->dimms = dimm;
mci->pvt_info = pvt;
mci->nr_csrows = nr_csrows;
+ /*
+ * For now, assumes that a per-csrow arrangement for dimms.
+ * This will be latter changed.
+ */
+ dimm = mci->dimms;
+
for (row = 0; row < nr_csrows; row++) {
csrow = &csi[row];
csrow->csrow_idx = row;
@@ -202,6 +212,12 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
chan = &chp[chn];
chan->chan_idx = chn;
chan->csrow = csrow;
+
+ mci->csrows[row].channels[chn].dimm = dimm;
+ dimm->csrow = row;
+ dimm->csrow_channel = chn;
+ dimm++;
+ mci->nr_dimms++;
}
}
@@ -678,6 +694,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
int row, int channel, const char *msg)
{
unsigned long remapped_page;
+ char *label = NULL;
debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__);
@@ -701,6 +718,8 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
return;
}
+ label = mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].dimm->label;
+
if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
/* FIXME - put in DIMM location */
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
@@ -708,7 +727,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
"0x%lx, row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n",
page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
mci->csrows[row].grain, syndrome, row, channel,
- mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].label, msg);
+ label, msg);
mci->ce_count++;
mci->csrows[row].ce_count++;
@@ -754,6 +773,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
char *pos = labels;
int chan;
int chars;
+ char *label = NULL;
debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__);
@@ -767,15 +787,15 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
return;
}
- chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s",
- mci->csrows[row].channels[0].label);
+ label = mci->csrows[row].channels[0].dimm->label;
+ chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label);
len -= chars;
pos += chars;
for (chan = 1; (chan < mci->csrows[row].nr_channels) && (len > 0);
chan++) {
- chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, ":%s",
- mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].label);
+ label = mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].dimm->label;
+ chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, ":%s", label);
len -= chars;
pos += chars;
}
@@ -824,6 +844,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
char labels[len + 1];
char *pos = labels;
int chars;
+ char *label;
if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) {
/* something is wrong */
@@ -858,12 +879,12 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
mci->csrows[csrow].ue_count++;
/* Generate the DIMM labels from the specified channels */
- chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s",
- mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channela].label);
+ label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channela].dimm->label;
+ chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label);
len -= chars;
pos += chars;
chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "-%s",
- mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channelb].label);
+ mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channelb].dimm->label);
if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_EMERG,
@@ -885,6 +906,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue);
void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
unsigned int csrow, unsigned int channel, char *msg)
{
+ char *label = NULL;
/* Ensure boundary values */
if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) {
@@ -904,12 +926,13 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
return;
}
+ label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].dimm->label;
+
if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
/* FIXME - put in DIMM location */
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"CE row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n",
- csrow, channel,
- mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].label, msg);
+ csrow, channel, label, msg);
mci->ce_count++;
mci->csrows[csrow].ce_count++;