| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
I thought that using TPC[0x0] like for G84:GT215 was sufficient on G80,
but it's actually not the case. According to NVIDIA PerfKit on Windows,
we have to configure PGRAPH related muxs on TPC[0x3] for this chipset.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
These signals and sources have been reverse engineered from NVIDIA
PerfKit (Windows) and CUPTI (Linux), they will be used to build complex
hardware events from the userspace.
This commit also adds a new class for GT200.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Switch to NVIDIA's name for the device.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
