| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
On some of these chipsets, reading NV_PGRAPH_GPC_GPM_PD_PES_TPC_ID_MASK
can trigger a PRI fault and return an error code instead of a TPC mask,
unless PGOB has been disabled first.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
|
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
