aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/memcontrol.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2013-11-04 13:48:30 -0500
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2013-11-04 13:48:30 -0500
commit394efd19d5fcae936261bd48e5b33b21897aacf8 (patch)
treec48cf3ddbb07fd87309f1abdf31a27c71330e587 /mm/memcontrol.c
parentf421436a591d34fa5279b54a96ac07d70250cc8d (diff)
parentbe408cd3e1fef73e9408b196a79b9934697fe3b1 (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Conflicts: drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h drivers/net/netconsole.c net/bridge/br_private.h Three mostly trivial conflicts. The net/bridge/br_private.h conflict was a function signature (argument addition) change overlapping with the extern removals from Joe Perches. In drivers/net/netconsole.c we had one change adjusting a printk message whilst another changed "printk(KERN_INFO" into "pr_info(". Lastly, the emulex change was a new inline function addition overlapping with Joe Perches's extern removals. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/memcontrol.c57
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9c9c685e4ddc..665dcd7abfff 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
@@ -2046,6 +2047,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
return total;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+static struct lockdep_map memcg_oom_lock_dep_map = {
+ .name = "memcg_oom_lock",
+};
+#endif
+
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_oom_lock);
/*
@@ -2083,7 +2090,8 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
}
iter->oom_lock = false;
}
- }
+ } else
+ mutex_acquire(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock);
@@ -2095,6 +2103,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
struct mem_cgroup *iter;
spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock);
+ mutex_release(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg)
iter->oom_lock = false;
spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock);
@@ -2765,10 +2774,10 @@ done:
*ptr = memcg;
return 0;
nomem:
- *ptr = NULL;
- if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
- return 0;
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)) {
+ *ptr = NULL;
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
bypass:
*ptr = root_mem_cgroup;
return -EINTR;
@@ -3773,8 +3782,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *from,
{
/* Update stat data for mem_cgroup */
preempt_disable();
- WARN_ON_ONCE(from->stat->count[idx] < nr_pages);
- __this_cpu_add(from->stat->count[idx], -nr_pages);
+ __this_cpu_sub(from->stat->count[idx], nr_pages);
__this_cpu_add(to->stat->count[idx], nr_pages);
preempt_enable();
}
@@ -4950,31 +4958,18 @@ static void mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
} while (usage > 0);
}
-/*
- * This mainly exists for tests during the setting of set of use_hierarchy.
- * Since this is the very setting we are changing, the current hierarchy value
- * is meaningless
- */
-static inline bool __memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
- struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos;
-
- /* bounce at first found */
- css_for_each_child(pos, &memcg->css)
- return true;
- return false;
-}
-
-/*
- * Must be called with memcg_create_mutex held, unless the cgroup is guaranteed
- * to be already dead (as in mem_cgroup_force_empty, for instance). This is
- * from mem_cgroup_count_children(), in the sense that we don't really care how
- * many children we have; we only need to know if we have any. It also counts
- * any memcg without hierarchy as infertile.
- */
static inline bool memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
- return memcg->use_hierarchy && __memcg_has_children(memcg);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_create_mutex);
+ /*
+ * The lock does not prevent addition or deletion to the list
+ * of children, but it prevents a new child from being
+ * initialized based on this parent in css_online(), so it's
+ * enough to decide whether hierarchically inherited
+ * attributes can still be changed or not.
+ */
+ return memcg->use_hierarchy &&
+ !list_empty(&memcg->css.cgroup->children);
}
/*
@@ -5054,7 +5049,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
*/
if ((!parent_memcg || !parent_memcg->use_hierarchy) &&
(val == 1 || val == 0)) {
- if (!__memcg_has_children(memcg))
+ if (list_empty(&memcg->css.cgroup->children))
memcg->use_hierarchy = val;
else
retval = -EBUSY;