From 7ed9f7e5db58c6e8c2b4b738a75d5dcd8e17aad5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:31:37 -0700 Subject: fix RCU-callback-after-kmem_cache_destroy problem in sl[aou]b Jesper noted that kmem_cache_destroy() invokes synchronize_rcu() rather than rcu_barrier() in the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU case, which could result in RCU callbacks accessing a kmem_cache after it had been destroyed. Cc: Acked-by: Matt Mackall Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg --- mm/slab.c | 2 +- mm/slob.c | 2 ++ mm/slub.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index e74a16e4ced6..5241b6598ba3 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep) } if (unlikely(cachep->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)) - synchronize_rcu(); + rcu_barrier(); __kmem_cache_destroy(cachep); mutex_unlock(&cache_chain_mutex); diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c index c78742defdc6..9641da3d5e58 100644 --- a/mm/slob.c +++ b/mm/slob.c @@ -595,6 +595,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_create); void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *c) { kmemleak_free(c); + if (c->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) + rcu_barrier(); slob_free(c, sizeof(struct kmem_cache)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy); diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 819f056b39c6..a9201d83178b 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -2595,6 +2595,8 @@ static inline int kmem_cache_close(struct kmem_cache *s) */ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) { + if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) + rcu_barrier(); down_write(&slub_lock); s->refcount--; if (!s->refcount) { -- cgit v1.2.3 From ec5a36f94e7ca4b1f28ae4dd135cd415a704e772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pekka Enberg Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:57:10 +0300 Subject: SLAB: Fix lockdep annotations Commit 8429db5... ("slab: setup cpu caches later on when interrupts are enabled") broke mm/slab.c lockdep annotations: [ 11.554715] ============================================= [ 11.555249] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 11.555560] 2.6.31-rc1 #896 [ 11.555861] --------------------------------------------- [ 11.556127] udevd/1899 is trying to acquire lock: [ 11.556436] (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [] kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b [ 11.557101] [ 11.557102] but task is already holding lock: [ 11.557706] (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [] kfree+0x137/0x292 [ 11.558109] [ 11.558109] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.558720] 2 locks held by udevd/1899: [ 11.558983] #0: (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [] kfree+0x137/0x292 [ 11.559734] #1: (&parent->list_lock){-.-...}, at: [] __drain_alien_cache+0x3b/0xbd [ 11.560442] [ 11.560443] stack backtrace: [ 11.561009] Pid: 1899, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #896 [ 11.561276] Call Trace: [ 11.561632] [] __lock_acquire+0x15ec/0x168f [ 11.561901] [] ? __lock_acquire+0x1676/0x168f [ 11.562171] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x113/0x13e [ 11.562490] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 11.562807] [] lock_acquire+0xc1/0xe5 [ 11.563073] [] ? kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b [ 11.563385] [] _spin_lock+0x31/0x66 [ 11.563696] [] ? kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b [ 11.563964] [] kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b [ 11.564235] [] ? __free_pages+0x1b/0x24 [ 11.564551] [] slab_destroy+0x57/0x5c [ 11.564860] [] free_block+0xd8/0x123 [ 11.565126] [] __drain_alien_cache+0xa2/0xbd [ 11.565441] [] kfree+0x14c/0x292 [ 11.565752] [] skb_release_data+0xc6/0xcb [ 11.566020] [] __kfree_skb+0x19/0x86 [ 11.566286] [] consume_skb+0x2b/0x2d [ 11.566631] [] skb_free_datagram+0x14/0x3a [ 11.566901] [] netlink_recvmsg+0x164/0x258 [ 11.567170] [] sock_recvmsg+0xe5/0xfe [ 11.567486] [] ? might_fault+0xaf/0xb1 [ 11.567802] [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38 [ 11.568073] [] ? core_sys_select+0x3d/0x2b4 [ 11.568378] [] ? __lock_acquire+0x1676/0x168f [ 11.568693] [] ? sockfd_lookup_light+0x1b/0x54 [ 11.568961] [] sys_recvfrom+0xa3/0xf8 [ 11.569228] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [ 11.569546] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b# Fix that up. Closes-bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13654 Tested-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg --- mm/slab.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index 5241b6598ba3..7b5d4deacfcd 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -1544,9 +1544,6 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) } g_cpucache_up = EARLY; - - /* Annotate slab for lockdep -- annotate the malloc caches */ - init_lock_keys(); } void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void) @@ -1563,6 +1560,9 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void) /* Done! */ g_cpucache_up = FULL; + /* Annotate slab for lockdep -- annotate the malloc caches */ + init_lock_keys(); + /* * Register a cpu startup notifier callback that initializes * cpu_cache_get for all new cpus -- cgit v1.2.3